|
Quick Lists
|
|
Bug ID:
|
4783335
|
|
Votes
|
0
|
|
Synopsis
|
Javadoc for method java.beans.Introspector.getBeanInfoSearchPath not complete
|
|
Category
|
guides:none
|
|
Reported Against
|
mantis
|
|
Release Fixed
|
1.5(tiger-b28)
|
|
State
|
10-Fix Delivered,
Needs Verification,
bug
|
|
Priority:
|
3-Medium
|
|
Related Bugs
|
|
|
Submit Date
|
22-NOV-2002
|
|
Description
|
Javadoc for method of class java.beans.Introspector
public static synchronized String[] getBeanInfoSearchPath()
says nothing about default value of search path.
Specification for this initial value has been removed from javadoc
due to bug fix #4234304 as implementation specific information.
This implementation specific information should be included to
documentation. So, javadoc for this method should contain assertion likes follow:
"Default value for this array is implementation dependent,
e.g. SUN implementation initialy sets it to {"sun.beans.infos"}."
======================================================================
|
|
Work Around
|
N/A
|
|
Evaluation
|
> In my mind, the "bad form" aspect is that once you mention it
> for one platform, you are "favoring" that platform over others
> (and the list can never be complete or guaranteed accurate).
> But including an example seems fine to me.
> I see no problem with the wording suggested in the second bug
> report:
>
> "Default value for this array is implementation dependent,
> e.g. SUN implementation initialy sets it to {"sun.beans.infos"}."
>
> This would seem to satisfy both bug requests. Would this be
> acceptable?
This is fine with me.
-- xxxxx@xxxxx
Fixed as mentioned above.
xxxxx@xxxxx 2003-09-05
|
|
Comments
|
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
|
|
 |