Submitted On 15-MAR-2002
roland-m
Implementation of Port and 24-bit, 96 kHz
and 192 kHz sound standard is very important.
Submitted On 15-APR-2002
bhamail
Ports are a must have. The lack of ports has already helped to kill one major javasound project I was working on. Trying to write and debug our own ports implementation was taking/costing way too much. The project didn't live long enough to worry about multi-platform issues. We really need a java implementation of Ports to build usable javasound apps.
Submitted On 29-APR-2002
on_da_decks
This should be a no brainer. Please implement Port asap--
Visual C++ is no fun to code!
Submitted On 17-MAY-2002
thomas_nlv21
Ports are needed to build even simple applications working
with sound!
Submitted On 25-JUN-2002
KoenTanghe
Port not implemented: very fundamental thing missing !
Please implement this !
Submitted On 19-AUG-2002
mamicha
Ports are a must. Very basic functionality to not have.
Submitted On 20-AUG-2002
JMHBOS
without ports the simple soundfunctionality of Applet is better
than sound.sampled.
Submitted On 23-AUG-2002
seniorc
This is really annoying and such a gaping hole in the API!!!
I want to write a Java sound application and ports are a
fundamental part of the sound API.
In the grand scheme of things there cannot be much effort
invovled.
Submitted On 17-SEP-2002
sarapci
Javasound is nothing without sound ports implented !!!!
Submitted On 26-SEP-2002
gonorovs
I need it
Submitted On 04-OCT-2002
chiefdaddy
I'd like to use javasound to record from line-in
Submitted On 15-OCT-2002
miked187
like trying to drive a car without wheels, trying to work with
audio without having access to ports is pretty futile.
please make it so
Submitted On 04-NOV-2002
bgavagni
How can this possibly be considered CLOSED, FIXED!
Submitted On 06-NOV-2002
bhamail
The required use of Windows Mixer, Solaris audiocontrol, or Limux aumix is NOT a substitute for implementing Ports in Java because no commercial application can get away with asking the User to switch to these native programs to select recording inputs (or playback outputs). This approach is like the "bad old days" where some applications could only print to the default printer in Windows. Even in the old situation, apps could at least typically switch the default printer for you from within the app (with the nasty side effect that all other apps that printed using the default printer would be affected by the change.) I realize that "it is possible" to change the record input using these apps, but it is not at all practical or professional.
Submitted On 07-NOV-2002
fgignoux
Trying to buid signal processing ( oscillo + fourier + filters).
Need to select my input & my output ! , How ?
Also seems that there is tricky things ( links) when trying to
get Target & Source Lines at differetn formats.
Submitted On 13-DEC-2002
Defrector
Hopefully hi-fi (96khz+, 24bit+) support will come with the
bugfix, as 44.4k@16 is going to get very very old very very
quickly in the future.
As for this bugfix, it would seem that the need is more
immediate than being que'ed on the next version as it is
critical for advanced audio use.
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
