|
Quick Lists
|
|
Bug ID:
|
4546581
|
|
Votes
|
2
|
|
Synopsis
|
GetCurrentContendedMonitor, GetOwnedMonitorInfo, GetMonitorInfo not implemented
|
|
Category
|
hotspot:jvmdi
|
|
Reported Against
|
1.3
, 1.3.1
, kestrel
, merlin-rc1
, merlin-beta
, merlin-beta2
|
|
Release Fixed
|
1.4.2(mantis)
|
|
State
|
10-Fix Delivered,
Verified,
bug
|
|
Priority:
|
4-Low
|
|
Related Bugs
|
4327280
,
4762695
,
4762902
,
4763264
,
4769391
,
4769558
,
4769563
|
|
Submit Date
|
04-DEC-2001
|
|
Description
|
.
The following three JVMDI methods are not implemented:
GetCurrentContendedMonitor
GetOwnedMonitorInfo
GetMonitorInfo
This bug affects the following tests from testbase_nsk:
nsk/jvmdi/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon001
nsk/jvmdi/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon002
nsk/jvmdi/GetOwnedMonitorInfo/ownmoninf001
nsk/jvmdi/GetOwnedMonitorInfo/ownmoninf002
======================================================================
xxxxx@xxxxx 2002-10-25
When I implemented the feature, I found the following additional
tests by grepping for each interface name:
nsk/jdi/VirtualMachine/canGetCurrentContendedMonitor/cangccm001
nsk/jdi/VirtualMachine/canGetMonitorInfo/cangetmonitorinfo001
nsk/jdi/VirtualMachine/canGetOwnedMonitorInfo/cangetinfo001
nsk/jvmdi/GetCurrentContendedMonitor/contmon003
nsk/jvmdi/GetMonitorInfo/getmoninfo001
nsk/jvmdi/GetMonitorInfo/getmoninfo002
nsk/jvmdi/GetMonitorInfo/getmoninfo003
nsk/jvmdi/GetMonitorInfo/getmoninfo004
nsk/jvmdi/GetMonitorInfo/getmoninfo005
nsk/jvmdi/GetOwnedMonitorInfo/ownmoninf003
During my pre-integration NSK run for my 2002.10.24 batch, the following
tests failed:
nsk/jdi/ThreadReference/ownedMonitors/ownedmonitors001
nsk/jdi/ThreadReference/ownedMonitors/ownedmonitors002
nsk/jdwp/ObjectReference/MonitorInfo/monitorinfo001
nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/CurrentContendedMonitor/curcontmonitor001
nsk/jdwp/ThreadReference/OwnedMonitors/ownmonitors001
|
|
Work Around
|
N/A
|
|
Evaluation
|
xxxxx@xxxxx 2002-10-11
The JVM/DI GetMonitorInfo() API returns a pointer to the following struct:
typedef struct {
jthread owner;
jint entry_count;
jint waiter_count;
jthread *waiters;
} JVMDI_monitor_info;
The owner field is pretty obvious, but the xxxxx fields are not. The
entry_count field could be the number of times the monitor is entered
by the owning thread (recursion count) or it could be the number of
threads waiting to enter (contention count). The waiter_count field
specified the number of jthread pointers in the waiters array. However,
is the waiters array the threads waiting to enter the monitor, the
threads doing an Object.wait() or both?
The resolve this mystery, I'm using the JDI spec for ObjectReference:
public int entryCount()
Returns the number times this object's monitor has been entered by
the current owning thread.
public List waitingThreads()
Returns a List containing a ThreadReference for each thread currently
waiting for this object's monitor. See
ThreadReference.currentContendedMonitor() for information about when
a thread is considered to be waiting for a monitor.
ThreadReference.currentContendedMonitor() says:
The thread can be waiting for a monitor through entry into a
synchronized method, the synchronized statement, or Object.wait(long).
I'm planning to implement the GetMonitorInfo() API to meet the expectations
of JDI's use of the interface.
xxxxx@xxxxx 2002-10-14
GetCurrentContendedMonitor() returns a jobject for two conditions:
- the specified thread is waiting to enter
- the specified thread is waiting to regain through java.lang.Object.wait
The first condition is clear. The second needs clarification. An
Object.wait() call has two parts: the wait for notification (or
timeout) part and the reenter part. I believe the phrase "waiting to
regain" is intended to apply to the reenter part. However, the JDI
spec needs to be checked to see what is expected by the higher layers.
ThreadReference.currentContendedMonitor() says:
Returns an ObjectReference for the monitor, if any, for which this
thread is currently waiting. The thread can be waiting for a monitor
through entry into a synchronized method, the synchronized statement,
or Object.wait(long). The status() method can be used to differentiate
between the first two cases and the third.
ThreadReference.status() says:
Returns the thread's status. If the thread is not suspended the thread's
current status is returned. If the thread is suspended, the thread's
status before the suspension is returned (or THREAD_STATUS_UNKNOWN if
this information is not available. isSuspended() can be used to determine
if the thread has been suspended.
ThreadReference.THREAD_STATUS_WAIT says:
Thread is waiting - Thread.wait() or JVM_MonitorWait() was called
Looks like the JDI layer is expecting that a call into Object.wait() will
result in the thread showing a contended monitor.
|
|
Comments
|
Submitted On 15-OCT-2002
jph
Your interpretation looks right to me. In my debugger, I
first call ThreadReference.currentContendedMonitor(). If it
returns a non-null result, I use ThreadReference.status() to
distinguish between the thread being blocking acquiring the
monitor (status == THREAD_STATUS_MONITOR) or block waiting
for a notify (status == THREAD_STATUS_WAIT). This works
with the classic JVM.
PLEASE NOTE: JDK6 is formerly known as Project Mustang
|
|
|
 |